tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25954340.post3866753401232841464..comments2023-11-03T23:18:25.999+00:00Comments on BIGNEWS MARGATE: BBC South East CENSORSHIP? & Kent Leadership challenge?Tony Flaighttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15212662248741515725noreply@blogger.comBlogger45125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25954340.post-69832874602841147282011-09-25T18:06:51.438+01:002011-09-25T18:06:51.438+01:00Now there is the difference, anon. I said presuma...Now there is the difference, anon. I said presumably every body who blogs with a name is a Tory whereas you have twisted that to not every Tory blogs with a name. Subtle difference but different I think you must agree.<br /><br />To be honest, the blogger, he who persists with his (I say his for I know who he is) theories on parasites running the show, masons, funny handshakes, councillors committing perjury, the people waking up and sundry conspiracies and cover ups, so winds me up that I feel compelled to respond. In so doing I guess I go somewhere well to the right like some latter day black shirt and make comments that are more wind up than reasoned argument.<br /><br />Unfortunately, you have a habit of getting caught in the crossfire, your lefty hackles play up and you respond with your anti-Tory rhetoric. Actually I am apolitical but probably over react to bigots and the plain stupid.<br /><br />In other circumstances we could probably find much to agree on and have a decent conversation.Will Lambertnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25954340.post-26970681542311550402011-09-25T10:58:48.451+01:002011-09-25T10:58:48.451+01:00Nice try on your part to point-score, Will Lambert...Nice try on your part to point-score, Will Lambert, but the areas of difference are quite clear. And no, not every Tory blogs with a name - and certainly not with the same (made up name) name every time.<br /><br />But still have a nice day...Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25954340.post-38385366708537773492011-09-25T08:53:44.255+01:002011-09-25T08:53:44.255+01:00Anon 8:17, I would dearly love to agree to differ ...Anon 8:17, I would dearly love to agree to differ but don't know what exactly we are supposed to be differing about. Presumably that everybody who blogs with a name is a Tory! <br /><br />Anyway, you too have a nice day for the weather is pleasant on this early Sunday morning.Will Lambertnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25954340.post-89090336514215560132011-09-25T08:17:35.416+01:002011-09-25T08:17:35.416+01:00We must agree to differ, Will Lambert. Have a nice...We must agree to differ, Will Lambert. Have a nice day.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25954340.post-59041574235131707892011-09-24T23:57:18.701+01:002011-09-24T23:57:18.701+01:00Anon, reading both the posting and comments on Tha...Anon, reading both the posting and comments on Thanet Life, reference is made to something wrapped in silver paper and a parent tells of their child being supplied with Malibou. Hence, whilst the silver paper wrapped substance may not have been a drug, Malibou is certainly alcohol.<br /><br />See you make assumptions as ever that everyone who comments is a Tory, even Nora whoever she (or he) might be. Evidence would suggest, however, that she is not a Moores creation for I recall her going well back into early Eastcliff Richard days along with Miss Piggy and the rampant nun. Imagine they were probably Tories as well in your book.<br /><br />Like you I too applaud Cllr Moores efforts in this instance but think, particularly as a councillor, he had a duty to publicise this incident. I would hope by now he has told the police and the local schools. This is not a party political issue but something that should concern us all.Will Lambertnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25954340.post-16042169950830713942011-09-24T20:39:39.515+01:002011-09-24T20:39:39.515+01:00Will Lambert - all these Tory supporter names make...Will Lambert - all these Tory supporter names makes me want to break into a chorus of Uncle Tom Cobbley and all - you need to dismount from your high horse for a moment. <br /><br />Batty Nora always charged in to defend Moores when he was in a corner - whatever the issue - and has been silent for years. Her resurrection now is a "surprise" - hence my (sardonic) observation. She re-appeared BEFORE the story about children having cigarettes (not drink or drugs as you suggest) being bought for them.<br /><br />I do agree with Moores about child exploitation, and applaud his interventionist spirit. But I also believe that true samaritans do their good works quietly and move on. They do not blast off about their works in the way that a certain Tory Councillor does.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25954340.post-45569500371355958852011-09-24T20:24:10.413+01:002011-09-24T20:24:10.413+01:00Precisely, Will Lambert, as I said, it could be Mo...Precisely, Will Lambert, as I said, it could be Moores in cyber drag. Glad you agree.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25954340.post-63768085322871967872011-09-24T15:21:36.215+01:002011-09-24T15:21:36.215+01:00Nora Batty, once a regular commentator on ECR'...Nora Batty, once a regular commentator on ECR's blogsite, has reappeared on an issue over on Thanet Life that should be of concern to all parents and those having the best interests of our young people at heart.<br /><br />Up springs our anti-Tory blogger with accusations of her being a Tory MPs wife or a member of Simon Moores's family. No doubt she also was behind the Deal bombing and committed perjury somewhere along the line! <br /><br />Is it suddenly just Tories who write echoing concerns about those who supply drugs and alcohol to school children or is it simply he cannot stand anyone agreeing with Cllr Moores on anything. How bigotted is that?<br /><br />Get real for far from suggestions Nora might be an MP's wife, how do we even know it is not a bloke in written drag?Will Lambertnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25954340.post-18403929063728692962011-09-24T15:09:44.921+01:002011-09-24T15:09:44.921+01:00Sadly, Anon, you seem to have no understanding of ...Sadly, Anon, you seem to have no understanding of anything I have written and persist with your own interpretation of my motivation. To cover that issue, it is simply that I get some pleasure from blogging and I cannot resist rebutting unfounded assumptions.<br /><br />Moving on to freemasons, why should they not toast the head of state. Many organisations quite rightly do but that does not make HM a mason. I do not know if the Duke of Kent is one but, frankly, what difference does it make if he is? It is a gentleman's club and, like many such organisations, does not seem to have the following levels of yesteryear.<br /><br />Finally, I do not have many other guises and whoever you may have conceded to in the past, I assure you it is not I.Tom Clarkenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25954340.post-63717003165333713022011-09-24T13:51:49.239+01:002011-09-24T13:51:49.239+01:00Isn't the Queen at the head of Freemasonry ? w...Isn't the Queen at the head of Freemasonry ? why would they bother to propose a toast to her and how about the Duke of Kent a very high ranking freemason.<br /><br />Is cllr carter involved in the building industry his planning application for a house in his backyard when through with flying colours? can always trust a tory to make a profit.<br /><br />A property tycoon's company has bought half the Olympic Village at a knock-down price, months after making a £50,000 donation to the Conservatives.<br /><br />http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2041229/Tory-donor-Jamie-Ritblat-snaps-Olympic-Village-knock-price--costing-275m.htmlAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25954340.post-69556383199025589862011-09-24T11:38:22.792+01:002011-09-24T11:38:22.792+01:00Tom Clarke, as I have conceded to you before - in ...Tom Clarke, as I have conceded to you before - in your various guises - it is, I fully appreciate, difficult to distinguish between anonymous posters. I am not the "Anonymous" who talks about freemasons and conspiracy.<br /><br />My posts here were 22/09 at 13.29, and 24/09 at 01.00. <br /><br />In your first contribution, you said that the "truth is more probably that these leadership challenges are no more than rumours, or wishful thinking...and do not amount to actual news". There have in fact been various reports, including statements from two leading Tories, that confirm that challenges are being mounted to Carter's leadership. In seeking to play these down, you are doing exactly what I have accused you of doing - trying to discredit or bury a negative story about your Party. Simple and undeniable - by you.<br /><br />You also questioned what others had claimed about a "conspiracy" between the BBC and your (Tory) Party. You "fell about laughing at the thought of the BBC...in league with the Tory Party...". Which, again, is what I have said. <br /><br />I hope that clarifies it all for you. <br /><br />Just picking up on another contribution, I am not criticising you - or anyone else - in any way for using different names. Unlike some, I have no issue with anonymous posters - which of course you are, as am I. Speaking of which, I am heartened to see Batty Nora resurrected from the dead over on Thanet Life (whose blogmaster now adds Robocop to his list of incredible achievements). Now "she" does intrigue me, for her timing if nothing else. I wonder if this is a cover for the local MP or his wife, or perhaps a Moores family member, or even Moores himself in cyber drag?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25954340.post-11310669141002926722011-09-24T10:16:14.993+01:002011-09-24T10:16:14.993+01:00The last comment was by me and the anonymous label...The last comment was by me and the anonymous label was a mistake.Tom Clarkenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25954340.post-39390499969551909302011-09-24T10:14:01.779+01:002011-09-24T10:14:01.779+01:00Now you have completed lost me, Anon. Since when ...Now you have completed lost me, Anon. Since when did I query the sleeping arrangements of anybody. Surely that suggestion eminated from you.<br /><br />As to your comments about my alleged party, I reiterate that I consider it unlikely that the BBC and Tories would make a happy union. That is not a defence of either organisation and, furthermore, I ridiculed your perpetual harping on about funny handshakes and secret societies. <br /><br />In this instance, who are supposed to be the masons, Paul Carter or those challenging him and just how do they figure into a conspiracy of silence with the BBC. It is all fantasy as ever with you,then you twist other peoples comments and, above all else, never properly answer any point on which you are challenged.<br /><br />As ever you bore a debate to death due to your inability to move away from or even intelligently defend your own pathetic conspiracy theories. With you it is just bigotted dogma.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25954340.post-13597999489309217852011-09-24T01:00:42.885+01:002011-09-24T01:00:42.885+01:00Sorry Tom Clarke, but you did not merely question ...Sorry Tom Clarke, but you did not merely question the sleeping arrangements of the BBC and the Conservative Party, you argued that the stories were merely rumours and not newsworthy. And that was my point - your attempt, yet again, to play down any negative story or news about your Party.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25954340.post-20599653996091076332011-09-23T21:50:59.925+01:002011-09-23T21:50:59.925+01:00Interesting, anon, how you bring Thatcher into the...Interesting, anon, how you bring Thatcher into the picture. Seem to recall Brown spent his time in No. 11 plotting how to get rid of his neighbour and then the whole Labour party seemed to be wondering how they could get rid of Brown. Now they have elected the wrong brother who is being stalked by the ever ambitious Balls. In politics they all have delusions of grandeur, regardless of party, and are perpetually scheming and plotting Ceasar's downfall.<br /><br />You tried those paracetamol yet?Tom Clarkenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25954340.post-81344385284387928162011-09-23T21:23:50.841+01:002011-09-23T21:23:50.841+01:00All very well, anon, but according to you they are...All very well, anon, but according to you they are all transparent puppets so it really makes no difference what transpires.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25954340.post-45181023356055953752011-09-23T21:00:41.008+01:002011-09-23T21:00:41.008+01:00It may be a Conservative party matter but the kind...It may be a Conservative party matter but the kind of person that becomes the leader at KCC has a major impact on the way the council operates and spend our money. Indeed by all accounts cllr Carter sets the policies and the present cabinet are just there as bystanders. Under Carter we have seen KCC set up businesses in competition to local concerns and take their eye off the ball where core services and investments are concerned. The business may make money but we have seen failure in areas like child services and many expensive commings and goings in top personel. A bit like the way Thatcher treated her cabinet and eventually they revolted.<br />It is thus essential that the BBC gives air time to cllr Carter's opponents rather then just let him alone preach to the tory KCC councillors.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25954340.post-77797850295220667872011-09-23T19:34:55.766+01:002011-09-23T19:34:55.766+01:00Retired, I never said it was make believe, but at ...Retired, I never said it was make believe, but at this stage a couple of former cabinet members, one of whom was sacked by Carter, are saying they are to mount a challenge to his leadership at the Conservative conference. It has not happened yet and, in any event, it is internal. What coverage the BBC give it will depend on how news worthy they consider it to be.<br /><br />Whatever, they cannot on this occassion be accused of any party bias for all the contenders are Conservatives. Makes a change from local Labour members perpetually whinging about Clive Hart's leadership. That's politics I guess and inevitable when you put all those egos together.<br /><br />By the way, I understand paracetamol is very good for relieving the symptons of parasitic phobia. You should try it.Tom Clarkenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25954340.post-72921196934133570342011-09-23T19:32:36.985+01:002011-09-23T19:32:36.985+01:00Yep heard Carter blowing his own trumpet as usual....Yep heard Carter blowing his own trumpet as usual.The bigger they are the harder they fall.To be replaced with another non transparent puppet no doubt! Makes you wonder why they are making such a fuss all of a sudden and what it might be covering up.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25954340.post-68595329410402963972011-09-23T16:34:40.035+01:002011-09-23T16:34:40.035+01:00Rick or Retired do you ever consider that less mig...Rick or Retired do you ever consider that less might be more.Tony Flaighttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15212662248741515725noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25954340.post-36797940337292393042011-09-23T15:41:53.338+01:002011-09-23T15:41:53.338+01:00You would never believe it but as if by magic cllr...You would never believe it but as if by magic cllr Carter was on raidio Kent Breakfast this morning for a question and answer session or rather a self promotion session. And would you believe it 2 former KCC cabinet members are to challenge him at next months party meeting. Just in case Tom Clarke thinks this is make believe he can listen to the man himself on BBC Iplayer.<br />I trust that the BBC will now give the same air time to the others that are standing.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25954340.post-58285676051409776732011-09-23T11:30:56.366+01:002011-09-23T11:30:56.366+01:00And so RC goes on and on and on in his various gui...And so RC goes on and on and on in his various guises be that Retired, or Anonymous or Lawful Rebellion, presumably under the misunderstanding that we are all as thick as he is. Well read, perhaps, in boring trivia but intellectual argument does not figure.<br /><br />Just ignore what others say and post again in one of various guises pretending to be supportive of his own case.<br /><br />Only consolation I guess is that I only have to suffer him on blog sites. Just imagine what he must be like to live with!!!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25954340.post-1766297135628352432011-09-23T10:38:47.473+01:002011-09-23T10:38:47.473+01:00Of course the media and the players behind KCC are...Of course the media and the players behind KCC are in bed together in some cases quite literally I should think.<br /><br />Which 'Crown' would that be the 1 square mile of the City of London which controls everything, from behind the scenes of course, or HM Queen Elizabeth of the 'Windsor' family who is supposed to be the defender of the common law ?<br /><br />May be Carter needs to be dispersed with after becoming or about to become too much of an embarrassment and has been given his marching orders from the puppet Mp's ? <br /> Of course they would have to create a smoke and mirrors excuse , prob came up with that in the lodge.<br /><br />Children services and the latter should never been mentioned in the same breath they are a disgrace to their public paid 'profession'Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25954340.post-20364902223717861742011-09-23T09:30:52.916+01:002011-09-23T09:30:52.916+01:00OMG, what a seriously boring old fart! ZZZZZZZZZZZ...OMG, what a seriously boring old fart! ZZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25954340.post-60203871715407501372011-09-23T09:20:33.264+01:002011-09-23T09:20:33.264+01:00Tony
People do not think of themselves as complia...Tony<br /><br />People do not think of themselves as compliant at all. The Romans deliberately educated the English into servitude. <br /><br />Now the people are linguistically programmed and mistake that for education and mistake their programming for their independent opinion. <br /><br />The people are issued with a label set for example choose your independent opinions from the provided options as follows: <br /><br />Racist<br /><br />Homophobic<br /><br />Little England<br /><br />Conspiracy theorist<br /><br />Human Rights<br /><br />Proportionate<br /><br />Appropriate<br /><br />Not appropriate<br /><br />Offensive<br /><br />Enriching culture<br /><br />Working on so many levels<br /><br />Ethnicity<br /><br />Diversity<br /><br />Respect for diversity<br /><br />Communication skills<br /><br />Freedom of speech (equating to right to anonymity)<br /><br />More enlightened way<br /><br />Education is the answer (With no sense of irony)<br /><br />We are a multicultural society that enriches us all<br /><br />Where there's blame there's a claim<br /> <br />Stereotyping<br /><br /><br />In about 1650 there were about 27,000 slaves in Barbados. About 23,000 of those were white British shipped in chains from Britain.<br /><br />Black African people tended to be made the overseers and black men forced white women slaves to work naked knowing their pale skins could not stand the sun. The black overseers raped particularly the Irish women slaves and this provided offspring Creole slaves.<br /><br />Ooooh aren't some historical facts helpful to the social experiment needs to place collective guilt upon the white "ethnicity" in UK ?<br /><br />Better keep the facts out of the linguistic programming model then.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com