Despite the fantastic weather this weekend, don't worry winter is on its way, how can you tell, well pick up any newspaper today and you will no doubt be able to read how unions mainly public sector are planning to go on strike, coordinating action for maximum pain to those of us in the wealth creating side of the economy
If that isn't enough you can expect a never ending stream of ungrateful union officials and others bleating about cuts, one thing they won't be worried about is the plight of the those in the commercial sector who have seen the pay gap increase from 2007 from 5.3% to an undeserved and insustainable 8.2% to the detriment of the commercial sector.
At some point, not too far in to the future this country will join ranks of the third world as idiot union leaders, witter on endlessly about cuts taking no interest in the wealth creating side to the economy which has an incredible burden of work shy parasites and public sector workers who have the mad idea that they are worth more than the rest of us.
If unions and the Labour party were to wake up and champion the idea that this country urgently needs to recreate the productive industries it once had I might have some respect for them but don't.
Rant over!
Be careful of your blood pressure Tony!
ReplyDeletepolitical parties and unions are a waste of time..
ReplyDelete"Men will never be free until the last king is strangled with the entrails of the last priest," - Denis Diderot
How do you work out that it is only the "wealth creating" employees who suffer the burden of the unemployed? This may come as shock but
ReplyDelete1) not all public sector workers earn a fortune. In fact the vast majority don't.
2) The one thing they all do is pay tax.
3) Whether you like it or not, your pay, however small, would be a bloody site smaller if it weren't for the union movement.
Yogi wake up and smell the coffee, without those of us making money by proper grafting or enterprise all you vaguely left wing muppets involved in non jobs or livin the high life on welfare, would really have something to gripe about.
DeleteHow many times do we have to listen to inarticulate work shy layabouts claiming its too difficult to job when they cannot be bothered to look after their kids expecting you and I to pay before this country sinks into the mire
Correction too difficult to get a job
DeleteI object to your assuming I am on benefit. FYI I am not. I have worked for 40 years including in the public sector.
DeleteI am now retired on no pension except the state pension.
I hope you don't begrudge me that.
The assumptions you make out of your own bigotry and preconceptions makes you the muppet.
Yogi I'm just exposing the moronic mantra from idiot leftwingers, sorry for slipping into stereotypical assumptions, the point whether you understand it or not is you cannot continue to give money to the public sector for made up jobs and of course people who insist on not working.
DeleteWelfare should be for those who need it not cheats, how many normal working people have found themselves that benefits are tailored for work shy underclass and find that help is minimal, and government agencies hostile.
Of course Labour has now accepted some of the damage caused by its policy of exploiting migrant labour, however apart from destroying wages and adding many millions to education and health costs change in communities for what another crazy experiment by rich Labour politicians like Blair who is always for hire.
Of course cuts are necessary because of Labour politicians were more inclined to fiddle or rather defraud taxpayers than look after the electorate.
The next instalment of Labour's progressive destruction of this country is already on the drawing board. Milliband's plan to soak the rich, forever returning to Labour's previously failed dogma, will hasten the departure of the very people who create the jobs, kill off inward investment and destroy London as the hub of world trading. In the process we will become like Greece or Spain.
DeleteSadly, though, it is going to happen because hoody hugging Dave is so busy trying to stop being nasty that he is losing all his party's traditional supporters.
Yogi, you enjoy your state pension while you can, for after another term of Labour, especially with Brown's protege, Balls, in the Treasury, the source could run bare.
This idea that the public sector is a leech is patently false. Most of the things surrounding you are the product of ther public sector. Your computer is based on the integrated circuit which was developed in universities and national labs through mostly government funds. The tv both old and new are based on cathod ray tubes and studies of phase transitions in liquids. The car you drive is based upon the auto or disiel cycle which were again discovered by physicists. The private sector then takes these ideas and makes money of them if it wasn't for the spending on basic research you would be living in the same conditions as the 17th century. I didn't even mention all of the medical advances that are also public sector products. The people that are needed to do all the jobs largely come from public universities. I am not saying that the private sector isn't needed but to say that it is a parasite is patentlyt false and simpleminded!
DeleteSo is one to assume that there is absolutely no research funded in the private sector? Likewise, are all the hangers on in sundry government departments all engaged in useful projects to make life better for the rest of us or is that some kind of joke, 05:08?
DeleteI honestly feel this world would be a far better place if Unions were squashed, I have never joined a union in my life and never will. If I apply for a job and it suits me I shall stay there until the end. I would never dream of becoming part of a rabble to put my job on the line. I have never been out of work for more than 5 days since I first started working in 1959, i am now almost 68 and still working and pleased to do so, love working. There are over 1000 jobs available between Thanet and Canterbury, why are these jobs not taken? Why are we still supporting these lazt gits who are not prepared to support themselves or their ongrowing families, if I were in power, if they didn't work to get their benefits they wouldn't get a penny, that goes for the single women who still haven't learnt to keep their legs crossed or even take all the free aids which are again available at the cost of the tax payers.
DeleteWhy not put them all in a boat and send them off India! Perhaps the Indian people would teach them how to work as they definately work hard and do o a good job over here
1000 jobs, eh? Unfortunately 90% of them are for 8-10 hours per week, so one of your 'lazy gits' would need 7 jobs to rack up the number of hours that you work.
DeleteWhy are you supporting them, why haven't you retired?
You could take the slow boat to India, sounds like heaven the way you describe it?
Actually what we need is a long term international strike, across every western and industrialised nation, stop using credit cards, stop buying their corporate crap, remove our money from the banks, until the scheming barstewards that are poisoning us to death have been arrested and locked away.
Wonderful, 06:43, and with economic wizardry like this one wonders why you are not residing in 11, Downing Street. On the other hand, thankfully you are not.
DeleteBy the way, if everyone strikes, and I presume that includes coppers, who is going to arrest the barstewards.
Yogi your claim that without the unions we would be worse off, seems bollix fr where I'm standing since I don't know a single person getting paid as well as they were ten years ago, probably directly attributable to Labours policy on encouraging exploitation migrant labour something for which every member of the labour party should hang their heads in shame from Tony Blair to the chancers running Thanet council
ReplyDeleteThat's because you don't have a powerful union Tony!
ReplyDeleteI have to ask though, why do you insist on calling yourself a Liberal all the time when your views are anything but?
16:00, The miners once had a powerful union and all they have now is a Lifetime President whose grace and favour apartment they have to keep funding out of their contributions. If you are mug enough to fund somebody else's lifestyle and OTT lunch expenses, be my guest, but don't wish it on the rest of us. I would much prefer to take my own chances of negotiating reasonable terms of employment without some semi-literate moron speaking up for me.
DeleteAnd your job is?
DeleteBricklayer.
DeleteWell that shut him/her up.
DeleteSorry, I was at work. Unlike bricklayers I have to work beyond 4pm to earn a living wage.
DeleteSo where is your powerful union? For the record, I was working all weekend to finish a job before the forecasted weather change.
DeleteFamilies would have more than enough to raise their children if they were bringing the sort of dosh that councillor/foster/adoption agencies/social workers get.
ReplyDeleteMay be they should stop using children as a commodity and support families instead of destroying them and ripping families apart; this would save a lot of taxes.
Bian clare and kevin bull discuss institutional child abuse part 2 orion talk radio
http://www.mixcloud.com/Andyscaravanrentals/bian-clare-and-kevin-bull-discuss-institutional-child-abuse-part-2-orion-talk-radio/
That they may have more than enough does not automatically mean they are all capable of it. The greatest percentage of abuse crimes against children are carried out by relatives.
DeleteRubbish, that is exactly what the corrupt corporate benefactors of child trafficking would like us to believe, otherwise their honeypot off the backs of children would stop.
DeleteThe greatest percentage of abuse crimes against children are carried out by the authorities from within the system, their glossy brochures, policies, and at arms length services fool no-one. The really incapable ones are the corporate parents and their cohorts.
Fools no-one? Since you are about the only person in the know I think your statistics might be a bit screwed. Check out the facts with the RSPCC.
Deletehmmm the government led RSPCC next you will be suggesting Barnardos, Action for Children or Child Poverty Action Group and all the rest of the paid puppeteers
DeleteAbsolute power and control over families in order to create wealth for the State and big business. Children have become commodities fact and thank god their are plenty of people in the know and their numbers are rising rapidly.
Where are all these people in the know for you certainly seem to be the only one around the Thanet blogs. I have raised a family as have my siblings and cousins, not to mention countless friends, yet I know of no one whose kids have been taken into care or carted of to the USA for adoption. You are just a scaremongerer and do a dis-service to the many honest professionals who do help children in need.
DeleteIf I had my way, people like you should be forced to prove your allegations beyond all reasonable doubt in a court of law and then incarcerated long term if you fail to do so.
No doubt you mean a star chamber, 19:57, presided over by one of your compromised masonic buddies.
DeleteNow that Jeremy *unt has been given the 'health' job, perhaps we should be wary of the possibility of water fluoridation nationwide.
In this interview, two West Midlanders discuss the despicable practice of adding toxic waste from Finland to the tap water in that region under the guise of water fluoridation.
Shocking stuff!
http://www.spreaker.com/page#!/user/thebenfellowsradioshow/fluoride_www_wmaf_org_uk
Sounds like they are running scared to me.
DeleteI agree all their deluded public sector workers 'should be forced to prove their allegations beyond all reasonable doubt in a court of law and then incarcerated long term if they fail to do so'
but as we all know their masonic buddies in their secret little courts wont allow this to happen all the time they are getting backhanders from the state.
UK Social Workers Exposed
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K76abVZ_x-0&feature=plcp
Total nutter!!
DeleteYou may well be a total nutter anon 10.10 but at least do some research.
DeleteRead the Governments own statistics 1 in 2000 children are abused in their family home from mild to severe. 1 in 4 are abused in foster care, these are official government statistics.
Paid to massive sums of tax free money to care or abuse, its not rocket science.
I wonder if any of our resident paid public sector elected corporate parents would care to say how many children in care where sent to Jersey for their "holidays"
DeleteFunny how we have to listen to Russia TV to find out about the UK culture of institutionalized child abuse all backed by the vast public purse.
Journalist Banned From the U.K. For Exposing "The Torture & Rape of Children"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LMB9PaGQGsE
Once one might have said that the lunatics have taken over the asylum, but with care in the community they are all out here infesting Thanet's blogsites with their conspiracy theories.
DeleteI doubt if anyone elses has ever bothered to follow 18:14's various website links, but I did once and it was utter garbage. Anyone who can believe that stuff needs help or pity!
I hadn't before now, but can only find the one, which I found very informative does that make me a lunatic ?
DeleteOk, we believe you, tee hee! Oh, and the answer to your question 23:20 is, YES!
DeleteExcuse me! I believe you are some what deluded, Councillors do not earn a high wage, in fact only £4.600 a year which is around £88 a year, some councillors put in a lot of hours for their community.
DeleteSocial workers have to go through a rigorous training and studying also they do not receive a fantastic wage. If they earn a decent wage they pay it all back in taxes, they have no consessions as those on a low income.
Those on a low income get help with c/tax don't pay prescription charges, free dental, free child care, free optical, all these added benefits are worth a lot of money.
I really think it is so bad that people on benefits are actually better off then those where both partners work. People should not expect the tax payers to pay for you to have more children, you should be working and earing enough to increase your family, not expecting other to do it for you. I am a single parent, never been on benefits and have worked 78 hrs a week mostly all my life, wouldn't have it any other way. I do get angry when I need dental work done and costs around £150 when I can't afford it, my children always comes first. This is how parents should be not scroungers as so many, also bringing their children up to be the same, I hate society as it is now, they have no respect for themselves let alone anyone else. Unions cause this havoc, isn't it better to have a job where you actually have money coming in than being on strike?
You have to laugh, Tony still thinks it is the 50's and that the UK is some industrial power house, he hasn't woken up to the fact that the UK economy (outside of finance) is pretty much based on service industries... So yes the public sector is quite large, but we help keep the private sector going as our wages keep them employed... lets face it you could argue that we should make the public sector bigger so that the corporations employ more people!
ReplyDeleteWith this kind of economic thinking we are doomed. The public sector draws from the national purse and puts nothing into it. That is not to detract from the many essential services they provide, but they have to be funded from the nations earnings created by the private sector.
DeleteTrue, we are no longer the industrial power house we once were, a decline heavily contributed to by the same unions that will ultimately turn public opinion against public sector workers. We do, however, have a flourishing financial sector. Something envied by and under attack from the USA and a target for hate and threats of excessive taxation by the political left. When that's gone it's goodbye to the bloated civil service and a rapid slide down the scale for all public funded services.
What? Blaming the decline of the industrial sector of the UK is about as far from reality as you can get. I know of lots of people who have their jobs lost due to outsourcing to other countries where the private sector corporations save labour costs, pay less taxes and enable the directors to take multi-million pound bonuses backed by other private sector companies who are the primary shareholders.
DeleteAlso just to remind you that this financial sector which you believe is the envy of the world played a large role in leading this country into the financial black hole that it finds itself. Yes years of rampant spending by the Labour Government didn't help and they should be held to account as well, but blaming this on teachers, nurses, doctors, firemen, police officers, the armed forces (which you do as you tar everyone with the same brush even though you think it doesn't with that cop out "not to detract" rubbish) is the most ridiculous statement I have ever read on this blog.
Fine, only glad to be of service. However, your comment about the armed services is closer to the truth than you think. They have been shabbily treated by the Coalition government because they are a soft target, even with proposals now to change the pension terms of those who have already completed their engagements. They are a soft target, no union or federation and no right to strike. Much of what the public sector elsewhere may gain by their militancy will be at the expense of the armed forces. That must really make you proud.
Deletemmm... I see you hit the "Distraction" button on your response to my comment! No other comeback but to complete go off on a tangent and not respond to a single thing I wrote. Pointless to continue, obviously the wind rushing through your hair as you drive around in your dividend funded Jaguar has started to impact on the cognitive functions of your cerebral cortex!
DeleteSuch fantasy, the dividend funded Jaguar is actually a ten year old Fiesta and the income is provided by the state pension for which I paid NHI contributions for 47 years. However, living modestly is not a reason to be blind and blame all evils on the so called filthy rich.
DeleteAlso, to correct your misinterpretation of my earlier comment, I said the financial sector in London is the envy of the US, hence their cooked up attacks on British banks, not the world and earlier had also said that government must accept some responsibility for the regulation of banking.
See you ignore my comments about the armed services taking the heaviest hit in the cuts so, in effect, you are equally guilty at going off at a tangent.
I do love to hear simpletons debating the flourishing British financial sector, based no doubt on soundbites from the BBC news etc.
DeleteThe City of London is the only spot, globally, where unlimited hypothecation is 'allowed', which basically means that they can commit fraud with impunity.
Whether this will still be the case post financial collapse, rumoured to be October of this year, remains to be seen. But there appears to be a bit of an exodus from the City of late, with many financial sector workers heading in the direction of Frankfurt or Zurich.
And, of course, you would know? Talking of simpletons, it would take one to think that Aunty has any love of the city. These are people who think Vince Cable is some kind of business fundi.
DeleteThat's the thing with simpletons, all they can relate to is party politics and the false left-right paradigm.
DeleteThey cannot seem to grasp the fact that the banksters control it all, but especially the BBC.
Not left-right, haven't you got anything better to do than marching up and down all day, you dozy little man. Whoops, look out, here comes the nasty bankster man, get fell in quickly and when I shout leg it, take to the hills.
DeleteSee, 08:58, you are not the only one who can be silly.
Watches TV, votes in elections, drives a 10 year old Ford and thinks he is on the winning team... rofl
DeleteHave a banana old chap, while you still can afford it.
Correction, used to watch TV back in Monty Python days and haven't been on the winning team since Sammy Bartram retired.
DeleteOh, and I hate bananas. If they are what you eat it could explain an awful lot.
"...If they are what you eat it could explain an awful lot..."
DeleteSuch as, why I am jousting with a simpleton, for example?
Exactly, when you should be sat around in your rain forest munching bananas and nuts with all the other monkies. Leave all the politics and world affairs stuff to humans, eh?
DeleteHumans? Or human rights abusers?
DeleteAnon 10.47.
DeleteHuman rights abusers who are too stupid to see what their taxes are paying for or just to ignorant to care.
Kevin Annett 15 September 2012 Announcement
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yl0GCZQ2ThE
It is unbelievable that anyone still thinks we live in a democracy when it is obvious that our society is clearly being destroyed from within.
ReplyDeletePlease find out and check the facts for yourselves just how deep this rabbit hole goes.Unions and political parties are just part of a far bigger problem, which we must put a halt to and fast, the trickery & deception has gone on for far to long.
http://www.ukcolumn.org/video/uk-column-live-6th-september-2012
21:48, see you are still confusing opinion and theory with facts. You are but a voice in the wilderness so why torture yourself. If what you claim were true there is nothing you could do about it and, if it is not, you are sure wasting your life worrying about it. Chill out, man, and enjoy life. Big brother is not really coming for you this week!
DeleteNo theory about it 9:57, 21st century Nazis are operating among us.
DeleteBut make no mistake, public disgust is gathering such momentum that a bunch of fecked up public schoolboys and their equally misguided minions will be splattered like flies on a windscreen. Later, rather than sooner, but it WILL happen.
Yes they are anon 11.09
DeleteBring out the fly squats or better still get them whilst still maggots in local government either way they must all go !
Utter nonsense and to my knowledge you have been forecasting this imminent uprising for over four years. Where is your proof and please do not refer me to some opinionated article by a like minded nutter.
ReplyDeleteI'm unclear Mr Flaig, which Nick leads the political party of which you're a member? Is it Nick Clegg or Nick Griffin?
ReplyDeleteClegg is infinitely more dangerous than minor stooge Griffin.
DeleteI think you probably know, 19:28, that is is Nick Clegg but, in his case, Griffin would almost be an improvement. At least Griffin does not pretend to be anything except a raving nutter. Clegg actually thinks he is a serious politician.
DeleteWho says the public sector is skint, thought war created profits, where did all that money go ?
ReplyDelete“This is quite ridiculous,” David Cameron snapped at ministers gathered in Britain’s modest version of the White House situation room, known as Cobra, in the depths of the Cabinet Office.
“Why cant I just order they are going to go, and I will provide a waiver and indemnity on the legalities?”
The prime minister’s irritation was directed at Dominic Grieve, the punctilious attorney general, who had ruled that 200m brand new Libyan banknotes, printed in Britain by the De la Rue and worth £1bn, could not be airlifted from a KENT airfield to the rebels.
UK Column Live - 11th September 2012
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xo8Uro5hXAw
well said Tony
ReplyDelete11 Plus question 1950s
ReplyDeleteA coalmine employs a lot of people. It receives £3 million of public subsidy annually.
It would cost £20 million in redundancy compensation to close the mine.
Private industry profiteering on the captive state owned mine market would still make a profit if the mine was able to pay £4 million less per year for its supply of electrical, hydraulic and mining equipment.
The ex mine workforce benefits bill each year if the miners are laid off would be £1.5 million.
Should you close the mine or address the captive market profiteering of private industry ?
Wrong answer = Close the mine and thus kill the private sector supply side too.
(This is known as the Thatcherite fallacy answer)
Qu 2 It is standard House of Commons (centuries old) strategy to reduce pro Crown anti govt muscle. Hence the age old trick of making commissioned rank too expensive for the able poor. The price, of incompetent army leadership, is worth paying to prevent intelligent poor from acquiring power that could challenge govt.
(This is the Commons use of the hooray henry)
Every war since Napoleon has started with setbacks. Dunkirk being a case in point in the 20th century. Promotion and appointment by merit is necessary in the short term to win victory. Then those leaders with merit are laid off.
Similarly Police. A force run by idiots who are govt compliant. Is it wise for David Cameron to expose the police as unfit for purpose (Hillsborough etc) and risk the police accelerated officer corps being replaced by competent people of merit ? Who are aware they are Crown officers and not govt lackey civil servants.
The public are already aware how weak minded and self serving the public sector is. But was Cameron wise, whilst weakening the incompetently led army, to draw attention to the truth of police corruption and unfitness for purpose.
Incompetent, bent mates are better than no mates for a Prime Minister imposing austerity. Discuss.
Well we are really scraping the bottom of the garbage bin now. There is nothing to discuss since you have answered all your own points and totally exposed your hand. Nothing anything the rest of us say is going to convince you otherwise so suggest you debate with yourself.
DeleteConsidering that destruction is the name of the game, I'd say that incompetent and bent is just what the doctor ordered.
DeleteYes, I suppose you would say that 08:15 which is why debating with you is a total waste of time. You don't have the RAM to cope with more than one thought at a time, EVER!!!
DeleteAnd all you ever do, 8:42, is resort to personal attack.
DeleteMy reply was to 19:14, so why don't you just butt out of it.
Ah, bless, 10:20, what a nasty person that 08:42 must be for attacking you personally when all you are trying to do is save the world.
DeleteOh, do spare us, you are 19:14. Talking to yourself is one of your trademarks.
ReplyDeleteYou seem to have a bit of a limited repertoire, 10.37, I'm not sure whether you are a human or a computer programme.
DeleteI'm fairly certain that 19.14 is Rick and I am absolutely certain that I am not.
What, not Rick without the Deal bombing, illegal ranges or a councillor guilty of perjury. At least Rick's contributions are well researched and far removed from all this bankster nonsense.
DeleteWell spotted on the computer programme. I open up like a targetted window everytime some nutter comments on conspiracies, banksters, people rising up or everyone's kids being confiscated by Goldman Sachs.
Anyway, time to download some upgrades.
Fair enough, but remember, treason is punishable by death.
DeleteAlbert Burgess - A Case for Treason - in 4 Parts:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O-xGM6hzeWk
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ro9KnxA8eLY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C1g2I7pjiKA
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dW7awGiMTOo
What has treason got to do with anything least of all the recent exchanges on this site?
DeleteDemocracy is a pathetic belief in the collective wisdom of individual ignorance. Democracy is also a form of worship. It is the worship of Jackals by Jackasses. Democracy is only a dream: it should be put in the same category as Arcadia, Santa Claus, and Heaven. Democracy is the art and science of running the circus from the monkey cage. Democracy is the theory that the common people know what they want, and deserve to get it good and hard. Every decent man is ashamed of the government he lives under. Every normal man must be tempted, at times, to spit on his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin slitting throats.-H.L Mencken
ReplyDeleteSounds like the middle east only they go the whole hog and behead. By the way, I have been on a ship called the Arcadia, met Santa Claus in Hamleys and heaven is finding a blogsite uninfested with nutters like you, 20:24.
DeleteWhy don't you feck off and look for one then, 20.50.
Delete"The Law demands that we atone
When we take things that we don’t own;
But leaves the lords and ladies fine
Who take things that are yours and mine…"
Anonymous, circa 1764
Because someone has to do their public duty and attack and expose you nutters where ever you appear.
DeleteAhahaha you sad git...
DeleteWherever is one word by the way.
Private prison owner agrees to buy prisons from the government if the government can guarantee a 90% occupancy rate (by arresting and imprisoning people).
Only if you choose it to be. To be really correct it should be written as two words but lazy practices over many years have brought them together.
DeleteOh, by the way, I am not sad though I have some sympathy for poor sods like you who are tormented by perceived wrongs everywhere you look and who live for some uprising of the masses that simply is not going to happen.
Thanks for responding to the sad sac for me, Tom, and good to see somebody else shares my aversion to these perpetual conspiracy theories that offend Thanets blogs.
DeleteI take it that you pair of lackeys are in favour of filling private prisons for corporate profits then?
DeleteSo long as you are one of the inmates without computer access, what a pleasure!!!
DeletePLEASE NOTE COMMENT MODERATION HAS BEEN ACTIVATED SINCE I DONT HAVE THE TIME TO SCAN COMMENTS AT THE MOMENT AND THERE SEEM TO BE A LOT OF OFF TOPIC RUBBISH
ReplyDeleteNORMAL SERVICE WILL BE RESUMED IN THE NEXT DAY OR TWO OR THREE
Public 'service sector' is doing rather nicely for all the "fat cats"
ReplyDeleteFat cat furore: Council chief wins £142,000 post to 'reform' civil service after £420,000 pay-off
Ministers condemned Katherine Kerswell's pay-off as 'disturbing and unacceptable'
Now she is working for the government overhauling Whitehall
Critics say she is the 'poster girl' of the public sector merry-go-round
http://www.thisismoney.co.uk/news/article-2202567/Kent-County-Council-chief-Katherine-Kerswell-wins-142-000-civil-service-post-gets-420-000-pay-off.html?offset=0&max=100#comment-19260978
Katherine Kerswell to lead implementation of civil service reform
The former managing director of Kent county council has been appointed director general for civil service reform
http://www.guardian.co.uk/public-leaders-network/2012/sep/12/katherine-kerswell-lead-civil-service-reform?CMP=
All very interesting 23:10, but I am sure most of us who can give a damn read this report in the newspapers without you repeating it on a our local blog like a parrot.
DeleteNow that Ms. Kerswell has been re-deployed by the same civil service, I'm sure she would have no problem with providing her services for free until her severance pay has been worked off.
DeleteOr is that pie in the sky?
dont see no pigs flying...these types are paid to c£%p on everyone from a great height prob too much NLP training from the government nudge unit
ReplyDelete