Saddam Hussein's trial unfair?
According to the organisation Human Rights watch, serious administrative, procedural and substantial legal defects mean that the trial of Saddam Hussein was unfair.
I am inclined to believe this to be true, although my reason is slightly different, I believe that instead of Saddam Hussein being tried by a judge and having defence lawyer's to assist him, that maybe he should have been treated similarly too many of his victims but that would be too barbaric.
I wonder how Saddam's victims, those that survived feel, it's easy for liberal organisations to criticise, but most would probably feel that Saddam has had a fair trial.
Human Rights Watch
Clearly Iraq was better with him - It was his son Uday who was the REALLY nast piece of work
ReplyDeleteDerek Giblet.
Is it just coincidence that Saddam was a keen motorcyclist and you're having a pop at him?
ReplyDeleteSaddam Hussein was a sausage and pie enthusiast who used to enjoy stabbing on the brakes in his Transit van just when a biker was about to overtake him. I thought everyone knew that.
ReplyDeleteit may be time for you to get over this one, East, I'm inclined to suggest you stick your preferred mode of transport where the Sun doesn't shine, but since you already do nuff said
ReplyDeleteThere are days when I feel I should just sell out, how much longer can I resist Rupert's News International, Cheque book,
ReplyDeleteanon the whole families going to hell, lucuy and Cliffdick thanks for the biking angle agreed mr gogh
Ear, ear, Vince old chum! Or should that just be the one 'ear'?
ReplyDeleteAnd by the way, Tony old sport, have you ever considered having a stab at not sticking your foot where the pies should go?
ReplyDelete